Issues
- Incorrect QoQ results when ordering aggregate selecftLDEV-5031Resolved issue: LDEV-5031Pothys - MitrahSoft
- try{} - fire and forgetLDEV-3919
- Deleting a file that isn't there = "success", aside from the exception.LDEV-3918
- Please consider adding troubleshooing info for FTP connectionsLDEV-3852
- DateTimeFormat adds comma to short on Java11LDEV-3744Michael Offner
- Add attribute directory to cfexecuteLDEV-2912Resolved issue: LDEV-2912Igal Sapir
6 of 6
Incorrect QoQ results when ordering aggregate selecft
Fixed
Description
Environment
None
Details
Assignee
Pothys - MitrahSoftPothys - MitrahSoftReporter
Brad WoodBrad WoodPriority
NewLabels
Fix versions
New Issue warning screen
Before you create a new Issue, please post to the mailing list first https://dev.lucee.org
Once the issue has been verified, one of the Lucee team will ask you to file an issue
Sprint
NoneAffects versions
Details
Details
Assignee
Pothys - MitrahSoft
Pothys - MitrahSoft
Reporter
Brad Wood
Brad Wood
Priority
NewLabels
Fix versions
New Issue warning screen
Before you create a new Issue, please post to the mailing list first https://dev.lucee.org
Once the issue has been verified, one of the Lucee team will ask you to file an issue
Sprint
None
Affects versions
Created 18 July 2024 at 19:06
Updated 12 August 2024 at 06:02
Resolved 12 August 2024 at 06:02
Activity
Pothys - MitrahSoft12 August 2024 at 06:02
I've checked this ticket with the Lucee fixed version 6.2.0.41-SNAPSHOT, and the issue is now resolved. The ordering of the aggregate QOQ works correctly.
Michael Offner9 August 2024 at 13:49
merged PR
Zac Spitzer19 July 2024 at 10:03
PRs failing to to the docker creds problem, thanks for the PR, you need to add some docker login creds to your repo
(help wanted, if you have any idea how to solve!)
there was a typo in the test case, i have fixed it
running the PR locally, all tests pass
Brad Wood18 July 2024 at 19:14
Adding ORDER BY to aggregate QOQ select without GROUP BY where the ordered column is not part of the select list causes the result to group on the additional column instead of getting a single row back.
Ex:
See: